What Are The Common Lease Disputes Filed In The Court Of Law?

Lease disputes generally occur between a landlord and a tenant. The dispute can involve a property that could be of commercial or residential. This arises when the two parties disagree with each other. These cases are quite common and many lawyers would be able to provide the correct solution.

The main reason for such cases is those different ways of interpreting a clause. At times, the dispute could be if it exits and should one consider the case as a breach of a commercial lease. A professional would understand all the clauses and provide the client with the correct interpretation. A novice would not understand the legal terms and could confuse with the dates as well.

The most common cases that come under this category include:

• The extent of premises
• Rent review
• Service charges
• Renewal of lease
• Carrying out of repairs
• Payment of rent
• Assignment and sub-letting
• Use of premises

Many people assume that the tenant is the one who breaches the contract. A few cases show that the owners also breach the contract and make a false charge against the tenant. In most cases, both the parties would need a representative to present their case in front of the judge.

The experienced authorities would go through the case and listen to both the versions and then question each party individually. This is their attempt to know facts. Once they give their verdict, both parties should oblige them. The lawyers would always try for a verdict that is in their favour.

Hire an experienced lawyer for solving lease disputes

Regardless of whether you are a owner or a tenant, it is practically unavoidable that an a dispute will emerge during the normal rent. Regardless of whether the dispute is little or enormous, involves big amount or not, the key is getting to a useful arrangement as soon as possible and for that you should hire an experienced lawyer that can effective solve your lease disputes.

Quickly fixing a dispute is essential for maintaining good relationship and the occupant can concentrate on their business.

How it can be solved?

Sometimes it is very simple, a good session of negotiation can do the job. And sometimes when the dispute becomes heated, the lawyer has to work hard to get a better solution.

You should look for a lawyer who can firmly handle the leasing issues for their clients. If you have urgent case then your lawyer should act promptly. Your lawyer should listen to all the details you tell them and then give you the best options available.

You need to look for a lawyer who can work hard for you to get the best results. Your lawyer should also make you aware about your legal rights and obligations and give you clear guidance. Smart negotiation is vital when it comes to solve dispute cases effectively, make sure your lawyer has that. If you wan to hire a lawyer for solving compulsory acquisition in Victoria then the same law firm will cater to your requirements. Find an experienced and affordable lawyer to solve your lease disputes.

The Need of Professional Help During Compulsory Acquisition

Compulsory acquisition in Victoria refers to an authority like the Government acquires a privately owned land or property. Usually, it is done for the construction of infrastructures such as roads or public transport. The property could also be acquired for public safety, in cases of contamination for instance.

Professional lawyers are often hired for cases such as breach of commercial lease. Every commercial lease is different and lease disputes can arise involving various points of contentions. Under many commercial leases, tenants might be responsible for paying common area maintenance (CAM) fees. These fees are estimated monthly and are owed in addition to the base rent.

While commercial tenants have the responsibility to conduct general upkeep of their leased space and keep the area in good condition, landlords can also have some responsibility for maintenance and repair. Compensation against such acquisition is provided to the assessee by the government.

Agencies that compulsorily acquire land should be accountable for the good-faith implementation of the legislation. Laws that are not observed by local officials undermine the legitimacy of compulsory acquisition. Good governance reduces the abuse of power and opportunities for corruption. Rules should provide for appropriate advance consultation, participatory planning and accessible mechanisms for appeals, and should limit the discretion of officials.

Claimants should be paid compensation which is no more or no less than the loss resulting from the compulsory acquisition of their land. Regulations should set out clear and consistent valuation bases to ensure that affected owners and occupants receive equivalent compensation, whether in money or alternative land.